Justice Clarence Thomas did not disclose two journeys — which hadn’t been publicly reported — paid for by a billionaire Republican donor, a brand new Congressional report reveals.

Within the wake of ProPublica’s explosive 2023 report into Thomas’ failures to reveal his ties to rich donor Harlan Crow, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee performed a 20-month investigation into the ethics challenges on the Supreme Courtroom.

The report — spanning 97 pages plus 824 pages of supporting paperwork — was launched Saturday, detailing two further journeys paid for by Crow that Thomas hadn’t beforehand disclosed. Extra broadly, the report additionally captured an array of conflicts of curiosity and undisclosed items by justices, prompting the panel to suggest the nation’s highest courtroom set up an enforceable code of conduct.

Each 2021 journeys had not been reported publicly earlier than.

In July, Crow flew Thomas from Omaha, Nebraska, to Saranac, New York, on his non-public jet and hosted him at Camp Topridge, Crow’s 105-acre property within the Adirondacks. The second occurred months later in October, when Crow flew Thomas roundtrip from Washington, D.C. to New Jersey for the dedication of a statue. The conservative justice stayed with the billionaire in New York on his yacht, the report says.

These journeys had been revealed in a letter from Crow to the committee.

open picture in gallery

The extra journeys fell in a lengthy listing of different luxurious items, lodging and modes of journey from 1992 via 2023 that Thomas had acquired from Crow and others had been beforehand made public.

“The worth of those items is troublesome to calculate, notably as a result of the vast majority of luxurious journey Justice Thomas has accepted over the past 20 years stays undisclosed, however some estimates place the worth over $4.75 million,” the report states.

Past Thomas, the report additionally dove into the 258 journeys that late Justice Antonin Scalia took with out reporting them in monetary disclosures — “in contravention of federal legislation.” The late conservative justice “established” the observe of accepting lavish items with out disclosing them and took extra sponsored journeys than every other justice, the Democratic workers members mentioned.

Justice Samuel Alito additionally didn’t disclose a fishing journey he took to Alaska in 2008, the report mentioned. This journey, which had beforehand been reported by ProPublica in 2023, included flying roundtrip on a non-public jet and lodging, the committee mentioned.

Earlier than ProPublica publicized its article, Alito penned an op-ed within the Wall Avenue Journal denying any wrongdoing.

Whereas the Judiciary Committee report lists “questionable conduct concerning items and use of workplace” by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch in addition to former Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the awards or items they accepted had been a minimum of partially disclosed, the report says, putting Alito, Thomas, and Scalia in a special class.

open picture in gallery

“Scrutiny of partially or absolutely gifted journeys taken by any justice permits for a correct accounting of whether or not these entrusted with immense energy have conflicts of curiosity or different types of bias,” the Democratic workers members wrote. “Because of this the items Justices Alito, Scalia, and Thomas have chosen to not disclose are a definite downside; they’re hiding this conduct and consequently their potential conflicts of curiosity and biases —from correct scrutiny.”

The committee renewed lawmakers’ name for an enforceable code of ethics.

“Whether or not failing to reveal lavish items or failing to recuse from instances with obvious conflicts of curiosity, it’s clear that the justices are dropping the belief of the American individuals by the hands of a gaggle of fawning billionaires,” Senate Judiciary Committee chair Dick Durbin mentioned in an announcement following the report’s launch.

“The very best courtroom within the land can’t have the bottom moral requirements. As long as Chief Justice Roberts and the Judicial Convention refuse to behave, we should push for a legislative answer to this disaster to revive belief within the highest courtroom,” the Illinois Democrat continued.

In November 2023, months after ProPublica investigation, the Supreme Courtroom launched a code of conduct detailing the principles that justices ought to adhere to — however made no point out of how the code can be enforced or the results for violating the code.